Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 86: 219-228, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35461993

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The invasion of truncal arteries and veins by malignant neoplasms is rare and the surgical treatment remains a challenge. Several techniques can be used to re-establish blood flow in a resected vessel and choice of the ideal vascular substitute frequently arises a debate. Comparative studies between prosthetic and autologous grafts disclose conflicting patency results. The aim of this study is to compare patency outcomes of vascular reconstructions performed using autologous or prosthetic replacement grafts in surgical oncology, in light of a standardized antithrombotic protocol used in our institution since 1997. METHODS: This retrospective study compared patency of prosthetic versus autologous interposition grafts following the resection of malignancies in 117 patients between September 1997 and February 2020. The 181 reconstruction procedures performed were analyzed according to the body segment involved, and divided into: head and neck, thorax, abdomen, and extremities. RESULTS: Overall survival estimates after 24 and 60 months were 53.2% (standard error 4.8%) and 38.1% (standard error 4.9%), respectively. No significant difference was observed between overall arterial patency, using autologous or synthetic grafts (P = 0.41). Overall venous patency showed a tendency to be lower in synthetic grafts, although no significant difference was observed (P = 0.062). For both arterial and venous reconstructions in the extremities (upper and lower limbs), significantly higher patency was observed using autologous grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous long-term graft patency may be superior to prosthetic in vascular reconstructions associated with malignancies of the extremities. This outcome was obtained using a standardized post-operative anticoagulation protocol.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Neoplasias , Humanos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 77: 25-30, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34411664

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of compensatory hyperhidrosis following videothoracic sympathectomy to treat palmoplantar hyperhidrosis and its effect on sweating in the chest, abdomen, back and thighs. Furthermore, to evaluate the concordance between a subjective and an objective method of assessment for compensatory hyperhidrosis. METHODS: Forty patients with combined palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy (15 women and 25 men, with a mean age of 25 years) were prospectively followed for 1 year. Subjective and objective parameters were evaluated, using respectively a questionnaire and a sudorometer (Vapometer). RESULTS: In the subjective analysis, in the first month, only 10% of patients did not have compensatory hyperhidrosis, and 70% continued to report it at 1 or more sites after 1 year. In the objective analysis, 35% of the patients did not present compensatory hyperhidrosis after 1 month, and this number persisted stable, with 30% of patients remaining free of compensatory hyperhidrosis after 1 year. The most frequent area affected by compensatory hyperhidrosis was the back in both assessments. There was no positive concordance between the results of the objective and subjective analysis at any time in any of the 4 regions studied. CONCLUSIONS: Compensatory hyperhidrosis is a very common postoperative side effect after videothoracic sympathectomy, occurring early after the procedure and persisting for prolonged periods of time. The most frequently affected body area is the back, and no concordance between objective and subjective assessments was observed.


Asunto(s)
Hiperhidrosis/cirugía , Examen Físico , Autoinforme , Sudoración , Simpatectomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperhidrosis/diagnóstico , Hiperhidrosis/fisiopatología , Masculino , Examen Físico/instrumentación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(8): 1659-1668, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684245

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients configure a risk group for complications or death by COVID-19. For many of them, postponing or replacing their surgical treatments is not recommended. During this pandemic, surgeons must discuss the risks and benefits of treatment, and patients should sign a specific comprehensive Informed consent (IC). OBJECTIVES: To report an IC and an algorithm developed for oncologic surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: We developed an IC and a process flowchart containing a preoperative symptoms questionnaire and a PCR SARS-CoV-2 test and described all perioperative steps of this program. RESULTS: Patients with negative questionnaires and tests go to surgery, those with positive ones must wait 21 days and undergo a second test before surgery is scheduled. The IC focused both on risks and benefits inherent each surgery and on the risks of perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infections or related complications. Also, the IC discusses the possibility of sudden replacement of medical staff member(s) due to the pandemic; the possibility of unexpected complications demanding emergency procedures that cannot be specifically discussed in advance is addressed. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, specific tools must be developed to ensure safe experiences for surgical patients and prevent them from having misunderstandings concerning their care.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Consentimiento Informado , Neoplasias/cirugía , SARS-CoV-2 , Algoritmos , Humanos , Oncología Quirúrgica
6.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(4): 823-833, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428790

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on surgical complications for patients that have delayed surgery after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes of patients submitted to surgery after recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients that had surgery delayed after preoperative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were matched in a 1:2 ratio for age, type of surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists to patients with negative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: About 1253 patients underwent surgical procedures and were subjected to screening for SARS-CoV-2. Forty-nine cases with a delayed surgery were included in the coronavirus disease (COVID) recovery (COVID-rec) group and were matched to 98 patients included in the COVID negative (COVID-neg) group. Overall, 22 (15%) patients had 30-days postoperative complications, but there was no statistically difference between groups -16.3% for COVID-rec and 14.3% for COVID-neg, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.17:95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-3.0; p = .74). Moreover, we did not find difference regarding grades more than or equal to 3 complication rates - 8.2% for COVID-rec and 6.1% for COVID-neg (OR 1.36:95%CI 0.36-5.0; p = .64). There were no pulmonary complications or SARS-CoV-2 related infection and no deaths within the 30-days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that patients with delayed elective surgeries due to asymptomatic preoperative positive SARS-CoV-2 test are not at higher risk of postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Asintomáticas , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
7.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 71: 220-229, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891742

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for venous thromboembolism is anticoagulation; vena cava filter placement is an alternative in special situations. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes in patients with cancer undergoing filter placement in a cancer center during a 10-year period and assess which preoperatory variables were associated with poorer survival. METHODS: Retrospective unicenter analysis during a 10-year period was carried out in patients with cancer who had undergone placement of vena cava filter. Early deaths were those that occurred less than 30 days after the filter placement or that occurred during the same hospital stay of the placement. RESULTS: About 250 patients were analyzed. About 51.6% were females; 77.2% had proximal lower limb deep vein thrombosis; 34.8% had contraindications to anticoagulation; 32.8% presented bleeding after the onset of anticoagulation; and 18.4% had the filter implanted because they were going to undergo surgery and could not be anticoagulated immediately after. About 51.2% of the filters were removable. However, only 2 had the filter removed. About 59.2% had metastatic disease at the time of filter placement. About 31.2% fulfilled criteria for early death. Of those, 34 patients were put in palliative care after filter insertion (median, 13.5 days). Body mass index >18 kg/m2, the absence of metastatic disease, and filter placement during the same anesthesia of another surgery (especially if elective and curative) were associated with a higher chance of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary evaluation (and possibly consideration for palliation) should take place before the decision to insert a vena cava filter in severe oncologic cases depending on overall status. Patients with a greater chance of survival at a 3 or 5 years interval seem to be those whose filters were placed in the perioperative context of other surgeries (specially elective and curative), who were not undernourished, and whose disease was not metastatic at that time. For patients who survived, an active investigation protocol for filter removal should be implemented.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/terapia , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Filtros de Vena Cava , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Contraindicaciones de los Medicamentos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Selección de Paciente , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
10.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(3): 418-424, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063368

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Several factors that could influence the efficacy and satisfaction of patients after bilateral thoracic sympathectomy (VATS) in the treatment of hyperhidrosis (HH) have been studied, but no studies in the literature have specifically analyzed the effectiveness of treatment and variations in the quality of life of adolescents patients compared to those of adult patients (18-40 years). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2431 hyperhidrosis patients who underwent bilateral VATS and divided the patients into the following groups: adolescents (472 patients) and adult group (1760 patients). Variables included quality of life prior to surgery, improvement in quality of life after surgery, clinical improvement in sweating, presence of severe compensatory hyperhidrosis and general satisfaction at one month after surgery. RESULTS: We observed that all surgical patients presented with poor or very poor quality of life before surgery, with similar proportions in both groups. In the postoperative period, we observed improvement in quality of life in more than 90% of the patients, with no significant difference noted between the two groups of patients. We observed that all patients undergoing surgery presented poor or very poor quality of life before surgery; however, the two groups were statistically different. The quality of life of the ADOLESCENT group before surgery was statistically worse than that of the ADULT group. More than 90% of the patients in this series had great clinical improvement in the main hyperhidrosis site, with no significant difference between the two groups. Severe compensatory hyperhidrosis occurred in 23.8% of the patients in this series, with no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent patients benefit just as much as adult patients from VATS performed to treat primary hyperhidrosis, presenting excellent, significant surgical results. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical research. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Hiperhidrosis/cirugía , Simpatectomía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Adolescente , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Simpatectomía/efectos adversos , Simpatectomía/métodos , Simpatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Vasc Bras ; 19: e20180131, 2020 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34178046

RESUMEN

We report a case of inferior vena cava filter perforation immediately after filter implantation, recognized intraoperatively in a patient undergoing laparotomy for resection of locally advanced ovarian cancer. We describe an alternative approach with strut resection, less invasive than filter removal, enabling the device to be maintained and bleeding to be controlled.


Relatamos um caso de perfuração de veia cava inferior imediatamente após o implante de um filtro. A complicação foi reconhecida no intraoperatório de uma laparotomia para ressecção de um câncer de ovário localmente avançado. Descrevemos uma abordagem alternativa, menos invasiva do que a remoção do filtro, consistindo na ressecção das hastes do dispositivo. Essa abordagem permitiu a manutenção do filtro e o controle efetivo do sangramento.

12.
J. vasc. bras ; 19: e20180131, 2020. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1135099

RESUMEN

Abstract We report a case of inferior vena cava filter perforation immediately after filter implantation, recognized intraoperatively in a patient undergoing laparotomy for resection of locally advanced ovarian cancer. We describe an alternative approach with strut resection, less invasive than filter removal, enabling the device to be maintained and bleeding to be controlled.


Resumo Relatamos um caso de perfuração de veia cava inferior imediatamente após o implante de um filtro. A complicação foi reconhecida no intraoperatório de uma laparotomia para ressecção de um câncer de ovário localmente avançado. Descrevemos uma abordagem alternativa, menos invasiva do que a remoção do filtro, consistindo na ressecção das hastes do dispositivo. Essa abordagem permitiu a manutenção do filtro e o controle efetivo do sangramento.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Cava Inferior/lesiones , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/instrumentación , Hemorragia , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Laparotomía/efectos adversos
13.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 67(5): 407-414, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with primary hyperhidrosis present with sweating in two or more sites in nearly 85% of cases. In this study, we examined whether the number of hyperhidrosis sites is related to the surgery outcomes. METHODS: One hundred ninety-three hyperhidrosis patients who underwent bilateral videothoracoscopic sympathectomy after failure or dissatisfaction with clinical treatment were distributed into three groups based on the number of hyperhidrosis sites (one site, two sites, and three or more sites of hyperhidrosis). The primary endpoints in the study were as follows: quality of life prior to surgery, improvement of quality of life after surgery, clinical improvement of sweating, presence or absence of compensatory hyperhidrosis, and general satisfaction after 1 month of surgery. RESULTS: Patients with two or more hyperhidrosis sites had worse quality of life before surgery than patients with a single hyperhidrosis site. There was an improvement in the quality of life in more than 95% of the patients, clinical improvement in more than 95% of patients, severe compensatory hyperhidrosis in less than 10%, and low general satisfaction after 1 month of surgery in only 2.60% of the patients, with no differences among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more than one preoperative hyperhidrosis site present worse quality of life prior to surgery than those with a single hyperhidrosis site, but the number of hyperhidrosis sites before surgery does not affect surgery outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Hiperhidrosis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Glándulas Sudoríparas/inervación , Sudoración , Simpatectomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Mano , Humanos , Hiperhidrosis/diagnóstico , Hiperhidrosis/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agujas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Simpatectomía/métodos , Toracoscopios , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
J Vasc Surg ; 69(6): 1880-1888, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591301

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vascular invasion is no longer considered to be an absolute contraindication to tumor removal, and complex reconstructions are part of the daily activity of vascular surgeons in specialized cancer centers. Our aim was to report a single-center experience of complex vascular reconstructions involving en bloc resection of tumors and patients' long-term survival and graft patency outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest report of vascular reconstructions published to date, with the longest follow-up. METHODS: Between September 1997 and January 2016, there were 91 patients who underwent 92 arterial and 47 venous reconstruction procedures in this retrospective cohort study. Long-term survival and patency outcomes were analyzed for all study patients and individually assessed in different body segments (head and neck, thorax, upper limbs, abdomen, and lower limbs). RESULTS: The estimated mean and median follow-up times were 112.66 and 100 months, respectively. The 24- and 60-month survival estimates for the patients overall were 55.3% and 31.1%, respectively. Survival estimates were significantly lower in the head and neck cases compared with the other body segments. The primary arterial patency rates at 24 and 60 months were 96.7% and 84.9%, respectively, and they were similar in all body segments. The venous patency rates were 71.4% and 64.2% at 24 and 60 months, respectively. Seven cases (7.6%) of arterial vascular complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular reconstruction performed in conjunction with oncologic resection is a feasible treatment option for tumors with vessel involvement. When surgery is performed in specialized centers, low perioperative morbidity and long-term patency rates are expected irrespective of the vascular territory undergoing intervention.


Asunto(s)
Vasos Sanguíneos/patología , Neoplasias/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
15.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 156(4): 1748-1756, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30054140

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Several factors may potentially influence the efficacy and patient satisfaction after bilateral thoracic sympathectomy as the treatment for hyperhidrosis, but few studies have specifically analyzed the impact of age on the efficacy of this treatment, the occurrence of compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH), and variations in the quality of life. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of age, body mass index, surgical techniques, quality of life before surgery, betterment in the quality of life after surgery, clinical improvement in sweating at the main site, and the occurrence and intensity of CH in patients with hyperhidrosis (n = 1633) who underwent bilateral sympathectomy. RESULTS: Quality of life improved in more than 90% of patients, and severe CH occurred in 5.4%. Age did not affect these outcomes. The older, the greater reduction in sweating, and CH was linked to other variables (body mass index, craniofacial hyperhidrosis, and level of resection). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that patients with old age reported an improvement in sweating in the main site of hyperhidrosis. Sympathectomy outcomes in older patients are similar to those observed in younger patients in terms of quality of life improvement and occurrence of CH.


Asunto(s)
Hiperhidrosis/cirugía , Sudoración , Simpatectomía/métodos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperhidrosis/diagnóstico , Hiperhidrosis/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Simpatectomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
16.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 47: 85-89, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28947219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are only 3 studies comparing the efficacy of 2 different types of lock used in totally implantable catheters regarding occlusion or reflux dysfunction. The present study contains the largest published casuistry (862 patients) and is the only one that analyzes 3 parameters: occlusion, reflux dysfunction, and flow dysfunction. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients operated at a large oncology center and followed up in the outpatient clinic between 2007 and 2015. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of lock: the Hep group (heparine), whose lock was composed of saline solution 0.9% with heparin (100 IU/mL) and the SS group (saline solution), whose lock was composed of saline solution 0.9%. RESULTS: The Hep group was composed of 270 patients (31%) and the SS group of 592 patients (69%). Regarding occlusion, there were 8 cases in the Hep group (2.96%) and 8 in the SS group (1.35%; P = 0.11); in relation to reflux dysfunction, there were 8 cases in the Hep group (2.96%) and 8 in the SS group (1.35%; P = 0.11); in relation to flow dysfunction, there was 1 case in the Hep group (0.37%) and 4 cases in the SS group (0.68%; P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding occlusion, reflux dysfunction, and flow dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Obstrucción del Catéter , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Heparina , Cloruro de Sodio , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 23(7): 883-887, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027659

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban-a direct oral anticoagulant-use in patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 400 patients with active cancer and associated VTE, defined as deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. This single-center study was carried out from January 2012 to June 2015. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety, using the incidence of recurrent symptomatic VTE and major bleeding, respectively, throughout the treatment with rivaroxaban. RESULTS: Of the 400 patients enrolled, 223 (55.8%) were female. A total of 362 (90.5%) patients had solid tumors and 244 (61%) had metastatic disease. A total of 302 (75.5%) received initial parenteral therapy with enoxaparin (median: 3, mean: 5.6, standard deviation [SD]: 6.4 days) followed by rivaroxaban. Ninety-eight patients (24.5%) were treated with on label rivaroxaban treatment. Recurrence rates were 3.25% with major bleeding occurring in 5.5% during the anticoagulant therapy (median: 118, mean: 163.9, SD: 159.9 days). CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban can be an attractive alternative for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/complicaciones , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enoxaparina , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
18.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 14(4): 473-479, Oct.-Dec. 2016. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-840265

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective To prospectively evaluate the perioperative safety, early complications and satisfaction of patients who underwent the implantation of central catheters peripherally inserted via basilic vein. Methods Thirty-five consecutive patients with active oncologic disease requiring chemotherapy were prospectively followed up after undergoing peripheral implantation of indwelling venous catheters, between November 2013 and June 2014. The procedures were performed in the operating room by the same team of three vascular surgeons. The primary endpoints assessed were early postoperative complications, occurring within 30 days after implantation. The evaluation of patient satisfaction was based on a specific questionnaire used in previous studies. Results In all cases, ultrasound-guided puncture of the basilic vein was feasible and the procedure successfully completed. Early complications included one case of basilic vein thrombophlebitis and one case of pocket infection that did not require device removal. Out of 35 patients interviewed, 33 (94.3%) would recommend the device to other patients. Conclusion Implanting brachial ports is a feasible option, with low intraoperative risk and similar rates of early postoperative complications when compared to the existing data of the conventional technique. The patients studied were satisfied with the device and would recommend the procedure to others.


RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar prospectivamente segurança perioperatória, complicações precoces e grau de satisfação de pacientes submetidos ao implante de cateteres centrais de inserção periférica pela veia basílica. Métodos Foram acompanhados prospectivamente e submetidos ao implante de cateteres de longa permanência de inserção periférica, entre novembro de 2013 e junho de 2014, 35 pacientes consecutivos com doença oncológica ativa necessitando de quimioterapia. Os procedimentos foram realizados em centro cirúrgico por uma mesma equipe composta por três cirurgiões vasculares. Os desfechos primários avaliados foram as complicações pós-operatórias precoces, ocorridas em até 30 dias após o implante. A avaliação do grau de satisfação foi realizada com base na aplicação de um questionário específico já utilizado em estudos prévios. Resultados Em todos os casos, a punção ecoguiada da veia basílica foi possível, e o procedimento foi concluído com sucesso. As complicações precoces observadas incluíram um caso de tromboflebite de basílica e um de infecção de bolsa, ambos tratados clinicamente sem necessidade de retirada do dispositivo. Dos 35 pacientes interrogados, 33 (94,3%) recomendariam o dispositivo para outras pessoas. Conclusão A implantação do port braquial é uma opção factível, com baixo risco intraoperatório e taxas semelhantes de complicações pós-operatórias imediatas quando comparada a dados já existentes da técnica convencional. Os pacientes estudados apresentaram-se satisfeitos com o dispositivo e recomendariam o procedimento para outras pessoas.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Brazo/irrigación sanguínea , Estudios de Factibilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias
19.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 14(4): 473-479, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28076593

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the perioperative safety, early complications and satisfaction of patients who underwent the implantation of central catheters peripherally inserted via basilic vein. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with active oncologic disease requiring chemotherapy were prospectively followed up after undergoing peripheral implantation of indwelling venous catheters, between November 2013 and June 2014. The procedures were performed in the operating room by the same team of three vascular surgeons. The primary endpoints assessed were early postoperative complications, occurring within 30 days after implantation. The evaluation of patient satisfaction was based on a specific questionnaire used in previous studies. RESULTS: In all cases, ultrasound-guided puncture of the basilic vein was feasible and the procedure successfully completed. Early complications included one case of basilic vein thrombophlebitis and one case of pocket infection that did not require device removal. Out of 35 patients interviewed, 33 (94.3%) would recommend the device to other patients. CONCLUSION: Implanting brachial ports is a feasible option, with low intraoperative risk and similar rates of early postoperative complications when compared to the existing data of the conventional technique. The patients studied were satisfied with the device and would recommend the procedure to others. OBJETIVO: Avaliar prospectivamente segurança perioperatória, complicações precoces e grau de satisfação de pacientes submetidos ao implante de cateteres centrais de inserção periférica pela veia basílica. MÉTODOS: Foram acompanhados prospectivamente e submetidos ao implante de cateteres de longa permanência de inserção periférica, entre novembro de 2013 e junho de 2014, 35 pacientes consecutivos com doença oncológica ativa necessitando de quimioterapia. Os procedimentos foram realizados em centro cirúrgico por uma mesma equipe composta por três cirurgiões vasculares. Os desfechos primários avaliados foram as complicações pós-operatórias precoces, ocorridas em até 30 dias após o implante. A avaliação do grau de satisfação foi realizada com base na aplicação de um questionário específico já utilizado em estudos prévios. RESULTADOS: Em todos os casos, a punção ecoguiada da veia basílica foi possível, e o procedimento foi concluído com sucesso. As complicações precoces observadas incluíram um caso de tromboflebite de basílica e um de infecção de bolsa, ambos tratados clinicamente sem necessidade de retirada do dispositivo. Dos 35 pacientes interrogados, 33 (94,3%) recomendariam o dispositivo para outras pessoas. CONCLUSÃO: A implantação do port braquial é uma opção factível, com baixo risco intraoperatório e taxas semelhantes de complicações pós-operatórias imediatas quando comparada a dados já existentes da técnica convencional. Os pacientes estudados apresentaram-se satisfeitos com o dispositivo e recomendariam o procedimento para outras pessoas.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Brazo/irrigación sanguínea , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
20.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 30: 159-65, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26541965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of oncologic patients with associated aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (AAA), treated at a specialized cancer (Ca) hospital more than a 10-year period. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, and the data were obtained from our institution's prospective database. Between September 2003 and 2013, a total of 36 consecutive patients with AAA in association with Ca underwent surgical repair. Of these, 9 patients were excluded because the Ca treatment was performed at another service. Most of the patients were male (22) and the most frequent form of neoplasia was prostate Ca. Surgery for AAA repair was performed after the Ca treatment in 19 cases, before Ca treatment in 7 cases and concomitantly in 1 case. The intraoperative characteristics, treatment technique used, complications, patients' clinical evolution, and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was used in 19 cases (70.4%) and conventional open repair (OR) in 8 cases (29.6%). Surgical treatment was uneventful in 19 cases, however, when present, postoperative complications occurred more frequently with EVAR (36.84% vs. 12.5%). There were no cases of death related to the aneurysm surgery. Most of the patients in both groups were alive at the end of the study. The probability of survival in our study was 65.8% at 3 years and 53% at 5 years, with no statistically significant difference between the EVAR and OR groups. The main cause of death was progression of the neoplastic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who present Ca in association with AAA benefit from surgical treatment of both conditions, simultaneously or not. In these cases, it is important for the treatment to be individualized, and the disease of greater severity should be treated first. The endovascular and conventional open techniques were shown to be equivalent.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...